The Notorious Nigerian Military, invasion of Nnamdi Kanu residence and the Umuahia High court Verdict

The Notorious Nigerian Military, invasion of Nnamdi Kanu residence and the Umuahia High court Verdict The United Kingdom(UK) on arrival to A...

The Notorious Nigerian Military, invasion of Nnamdi Kanu residence and the Umuahia High court Verdict

The United Kingdom(UK) on arrival to Africa, with their zero-sum or win-lose mindset, waged a war against resistance from certain tribes, especially Biafrans. Using their war games strategy such as divide and conquer, they formed an army of locals. With the pre-meditated intention and plan to kill and enslave, the criminal outcasts who were converted to soldiers and armed with superior weapon of destruction were instructed to kill their own people or force them to yield to United Kingdom’s terms.

However, United Kingdom met strong resistance in their bid to annex Nigeria. History has foretold of casualties suffered in the hands of Biafrans defending their ancestral land. The exploits of Ekumeku of the Igbo tribe is known far and near. As a result, the formation of Nigerian army, like the West African Frontier Force(WAFF), was done for the sole purpose of helping United Kingdom win a war of attrition against the indigenous people.

Sadly, when that army was formed in the year 1900, the romance between the Fulani (a non-indigenous tribe) and the United Kingdom was already 94-year-old.

And, as was the case during colonialism, the neocolonialism army is lawless, reckless, abusive and destructive. It does not matter whether it is a democracy, quasi-democracy or autocracy; their modus operandi is the same. It is an army that see itself as a law, and beyond control of the Judiciary.

Let it be known that the Nigerian army serves at the mercy of British hegemony with an addendum – total Islamization of Biafraland.

Therefore, the courageous verdict by Justice Benson Anya, Abia state high court, Umuahia, against an ultra vire army sets the following highlights:

1. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu did not jump bail. Anyone or media using such term is liable to suit and risks going to jail.

2. IPOB is not a terrorist organization. Judge Benson Anya referred to the military invasion as “notorious and brazen.” Since IPOB was ‘proscribed’ on a trumped up charge from a rogue military mission, this verdict invalidates that negative classification.

3. Compensation and apology are rendered to a victimized party, not the other way, in law. Deductively, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, and IPOB, were offended.

4. A court of competent jurisdiction recommending a political solution, shows that ‘referendum’ is a political opinion that is valid and constitutional. It is not a call for war. No one deserves a jail sentence for having a different political opinion from a president, not to talk of being death sentence.

In conclusion, an army of a country defends the territorial integrity from external attacks and protects the interests of citizens.  On the contrary, the Nigerian army is waging war against the indigenous people in order to protect United Kingdom’s special ‘existential’ interest. United Kingdom thinks others do not deserve to ‘exist.’ But the truth remains that "what is good for United Kingdom, is good for Biafrans". Nigeria and in extension, the UK should come to the negotiating table, unless they are ‘white supremacists.’

Written by Chibueze Daniel

Edited by Ogah C S Maduabuchi

Family Writers Press International