Fulani Conquest: Feeding Bottle Federalism And The Tolerance Limit Of Indigenous People

 Fulani Conquest: Feeding Bottle Federalism And The Tolerance Limit Of Indigenous People An Igbo adage says that it is the stubborn fly that...

 Fulani Conquest: Feeding Bottle Federalism And The Tolerance Limit Of Indigenous People

An Igbo adage says that it is the stubborn fly that has no advisor that will end six feet with a corpse. Perhaps, one can make a valid argument and rightly so, the above adage would be succinctly presented as “a stubborn fly with a bad advisor ends 6 feet with a corpse.” 

It is literally quite glaring that the British advised the nomadic Fulani terribly. It is well understood that the British are sociopaths, as their disruptive legacy of land grab and colonial expansionism litter across the globe. It is also argued that the British are not indigenous to the land they presently occupy, but that is a story for another day.

However, for the purpose of how the Fulani became the preferred slave, the outstanding factor was the similar trait of dislodging people from their land. Therefore, if Fulani was indigenous to the land, Britain will not co-opt them. Britain never wanted an indigenous person who might summon ancestral power to challenge them tomorrow. This is why Fulani keeps seeking settlement among the indigenous population. They hope to replicate what they did with the indigenous Hausa and Yoruba. 

It can be argued validly that the British and Fulani are the same people with different skin colors. Both master the art of lying and the art of war through deception. The Fulani use Koran to lie (taqqiya) while the British lie with the Bible. Both do not honor any Treaty. The Fulani broke the Treaty entered into with Hausa and Yoruba by the sword while Britain desecrated Biafra land at gunpoint in 17 century. Both want feeding bottle federalism.

Some scholars argue that both the British and Fulani are leeches. They come to your land, they steal, plunder, abuse and rape women, kidnap and terrorize. There are a few that ridiculously argue that they received indigenous help. Such an argument is baseless, flimsy and untenable. This is because we need to understand the mindset of the invader. It doesn’t matter what the indigenes did or did not do. They already had their plans to execute with or without the help of those infinitesimal indigenes. They are invaders!

The feeding bottle federalism is a concept of a parasitic life. That is what the leeches represent. That is what the British and Fulani represent. All the colonies and Commonwealth countries exist (without the exception of any African country) to serve Buckingham Palace, the same way Fulani emirs sit on the wealth of indigenous Hausa and Yoruba. It is estimated that the entire Buckingham Palace and the British economy are direct spoils of war. Britain (and of course the entire west) can not survive on their own, the same way Fulani can not survive. So, they latch onto others like leeches.

Before the coming of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Africans valued ideology and religion over self-preservation. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu taught great Biafrans, and indeed other Africans, to seek self-preservation through common sense; to seek communal and national interest first, every other thing should be secondary.

It is the development of the frontal-lobe that made the indigenous people appreciate self-preservation; to reach their tolerance limit. The indigenous population now knows that they have a common enemy in Christian British and Moslem Fulani. They have come to the realization that whether Christian or Moslem, they must align to defeat their common enemy. This is why Judeo-Christian Biafra will align with the AES Moslem countries of Burkina Faso, Niger and Mali for the survival of mother Africa.

Family Writers Press International